E 'for a long time since I write on my blog.
The Israeli-Palestinian tragedy, compromise and peace: a vision of Amos Oz
CONSIDERATIONS Amos Oz are permeated by an inspired realism. Like when he stresses that "the opposite of war is not the love and the opposite of war is not even pity, and the opposite of war has nothing to do with the generosity and forgiveness and brotherhood. No, the opposite of war is peace. Nations must be able to live in peace. If I make time to see the state of Israel and the State of Palestine living side by side pattern, without bloodshed, without terrorism, without violence, I'd be happy even if it were a triumph of ...». In his country, Israel, Amos Oz calls an act of courage. Political, moral, intellectual. And historic. In particular, a pressing issue, crucial to a peace agreement: the issue of Palestinian refugees. "The time has come - says writer - to openly acknowledge our participation in the catastrophe that imprisons the Palestinian refugees. We are not alone responsible, and the only culprits, but our hands are not clean. The State of Israel is strong and mature enough to admit their share of responsibility and to speed up the conclusions. "
"The decision to involve more in creating a true social democratic party, is derived from the consideration that the next Israeli elections (scheduled for February 10, 2009, ed.) may be decisive for the future of the country. Could result in the choice of the path of peace or war. This is what is at stake. And we have never been so close, as now, an agreement with the Palestinians. With regard to the nature of this team, I felt that only the Meretz (left secular and pacifist, ed.) May serve as a basis for giving expression to the need for a party that carries out a social democratic platform that today, in Israeli politics, has no real representation. "
"Unfortunately, very little. The Labour Party has become a partner very marginal government coalitions led by others. Its historic mission has been completed and a success is only partial. It's true - and this must be recognized - that the Israeli left has managed to penetrate many of his ideas in Israeli public opinion. Many taboos have been broken. We can certainly say that, largely, the area's political center-right Israeli today, has absorbed and made their positions for which 15-20 years ago, the left was accused of defeatism, or worse, treason . The problem is that Labour have failed to carry through this work: they have convinced much of the public on the positions of principle, but failed to find a way to make concrete and accepted by the majority even with the inevitable conclusion, that means the necessity of ending the conflict based on territorial borders of 1967, West Jerusalem capital of Israel and East Jerusalem the capital of a Palestinian state and assurance of peace and security for Israel. But that's not all ... "
"The Labour Party was a partner in recent years, governments have been running the country on the basis of a capitalist economy would call brutal, without rules, without social constraints. This state of things must be radically changed. Go find a social-economic system that gives the right answer to the needs of even the poorest sections of society and in need of help. "
Israel has lived for years between fear and hope. Feelings that mark the present and influence the future. What is the vision of Israel of which you are the bearer?
"I think we should and we can end the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, or at least reduce its size to compare with the regime, to Hamas, which now controls Gaza. Such a result would represent in itself a historical fact has changed a lot over the current situation, as throw open the possibility of peace with the Arab world. "
It is said that intellectuals are critical conscience of a country. This assumption is still valid and if so, how to set the current reality of Israel?
"The Israeli intellectuals cover a wide span of ideas so as to make difficult and unlikely any attempt at generalization. I myself do not see myself as a consciousness of Israeli society. I consider myself an involved citizen, who has a particular sensitivity to language. This is the channel that brings me closer to the reality of the country and social commitment that brings me feel I have to give. "
"The only way out for passes compromessoe for the recognition of its existence in peace and in its sovereign and secure borders. Where there is a clash between two just rights, including fair and equitable, the finalepuò only be of two types: Shakespeare or Chekhov. In the first scene is littered with dead bodies and despair reigns in the second, all the characters are dissatisfied, melancholy, sad and heart heart broken, but nobody dies. I am looking for a final Israeli-Palestinian tragedy to Chekhov. "
"Definitely not. You see, when I say I do not mean capitulation compromise, I will not turn the other cheek to the adversary, an enemy, a bride. I intend to meet each other, more or less halfway. Everyone knows the price and terms. Everyone knows, kilometer, mile less, what will the final map of the Agreement. It's just a matter of courageous leadership of both parties, to realize what the two people already know in their hearts. And compromise means that the Palestinian people should never kneel, or even should do the Jewish people in Israel. One of the features of this tragedy is that he wanted to defer the research, inevitably, a compromise. Inevitable because, like it or not, we must divide this land: neither we nor they have nowhere else to go, "
Unity November 30, 2008
0 comments:
Post a Comment